INSS Press INSS Press

Peer Review Policy

Review Model

INSS journals use double-blind peer review unless otherwise stated on the journal’s page. At least two expert reviewers typically evaluate each manuscript.

Process

  1. Initial Assessment: Editors screen submissions for fit, quality, and ethical compliance.
  2. External Review: Qualified, independent reviewers assess originality, rigor, significance, and clarity.
  3. Decision: Editorial decisions may be Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject.

Timelines

We aim to provide an initial decision within 4–6 weeks. Timelines may vary by field and reviewer availability.

Confidentiality

Manuscripts and peer reviews are confidential and must not be shared without permission. Reviewers must not use unpublished information for personal advantage.

Conflicts of Interest

Editors and reviewers must decline assignments when a conflict exists (e.g., recent collaboration, supervisory relationships, financial interests).

Review Quality

Reviews should be constructive, evidence-based, and respectful, providing enough detail for authors to improve their work.